<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1241 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340738</link>
    <description>Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme immunity was read to cover penalty and consequential interest directly linked to tax arrears outstanding on 31.03.1998, even where the formal penalty order was passed later, provided the liability arose from the same declared arrears and the scheme certificate had been issued for that subject matter. The commentary also states that refund adjustment under section 245 requires prior written intimation of the proposed set-off and a real opportunity to object; absent such notice and opportunity, the adjustment offends natural justice and is invalid. On that basis, the penalty demand, related interest, and refund adjustment were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1241 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340738</link>
      <description>Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme immunity was read to cover penalty and consequential interest directly linked to tax arrears outstanding on 31.03.1998, even where the formal penalty order was passed later, provided the liability arose from the same declared arrears and the scheme certificate had been issued for that subject matter. The commentary also states that refund adjustment under section 245 requires prior written intimation of the proposed set-off and a real opportunity to object; absent such notice and opportunity, the adjustment offends natural justice and is invalid. On that basis, the penalty demand, related interest, and refund adjustment were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>