<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7220</link>
    <description>Properties received on partition are capital in character at inception, but they may be treated as stock-in-trade if the surrounding facts and the assessee&#039;s conduct show an intention to use them as trading assets. Here, the Tribunal relied on the treatment of the properties in the business accounts, the crediting of sale proceeds to the money-lending account, and the use of the proceeds in that business. Those facts supported the inference that the properties had been converted into stock-in-trade, and the sale profit was therefore taxable as income. In reference jurisdiction, no misdirection in law was shown to justify reappreciation of the factual finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7220</link>
      <description>Properties received on partition are capital in character at inception, but they may be treated as stock-in-trade if the surrounding facts and the assessee&#039;s conduct show an intention to use them as trading assets. Here, the Tribunal relied on the treatment of the properties in the business accounts, the crediting of sale proceeds to the money-lending account, and the use of the proceeds in that business. Those facts supported the inference that the properties had been converted into stock-in-trade, and the sale profit was therefore taxable as income. In reference jurisdiction, no misdirection in law was shown to justify reappreciation of the factual finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>