<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1226 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It found the reassessment proceedings invalid due to the absence of fresh tangible material and confirmed the compensation of Rs. 6.50 crores as a genuine and ascertained liability, allowable as a business expense. The decision was announced in open court at the hearing&#039;s end.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1226 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It found the reassessment proceedings invalid due to the absence of fresh tangible material and confirmed the compensation of Rs. 6.50 crores as a genuine and ascertained liability, allowable as a business expense. The decision was announced in open court at the hearing&#039;s end.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>