<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1224 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 1,73,35,28,049/- made under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the fulfillment of export obligations, reducing customs duty liability, qualifies as payment under Section 43B. The issues concerning the reopening of the assessment and alternative grounds were considered academic and not addressed in detail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1224 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 1,73,35,28,049/- made under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the fulfillment of export obligations, reducing customs duty liability, qualifies as payment under Section 43B. The issues concerning the reopening of the assessment and alternative grounds were considered academic and not addressed in detail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>