https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340717 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD upheld the liability of the appellant for service tax under business auxiliary service (BAS) due to profit-sharing agreements with service providers, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal condoned a 17-day delay in filing the appeal and rejected the appellant's argument that demand notices were time-barred. It concluded that the consideration received by the appellant constituted a form of business auxiliary service, making them liable for service tax on the commission received. The Tribunal affirmed the original order, finding the appellant responsible for the service tax liability. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340717 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD upheld the liability of the appellant for service tax under business auxiliary service (BAS) due to profit-sharing agreements with service providers, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal condoned a 17-day delay in filing the appeal and rejected the appellant's argument that demand notices were time-barred. It concluded that the consideration received by the appellant constituted a form of business auxiliary service, making them liable for service tax on the commission received. The Tribunal affirmed the original order, finding the appellant responsible for the service tax liability. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340717