<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1210 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of Cenvat credit imposed on the appellants for alleged wrongful availing of credit on inputs not used in the manufacture of final products. The denial was deemed unsustainable as it was based on assumptions without sufficient corroborative evidence. The appellants&#039; contentions, supported by documentary evidence, were not adequately verified by the authorities. The Tribunal concluded that the denial lacked legal basis and allowed the appeal, overturning the original decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:04:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1210 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denial of Cenvat credit imposed on the appellants for alleged wrongful availing of credit on inputs not used in the manufacture of final products. The denial was deemed unsustainable as it was based on assumptions without sufficient corroborative evidence. The appellants&#039; contentions, supported by documentary evidence, were not adequately verified by the authorities. The Tribunal concluded that the denial lacked legal basis and allowed the appeal, overturning the original decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>