<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1207 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the charge of under valuation but remanded the matter for a denovo quantification of duty based on comparable value of similar products manufactured by others. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the method adopted by the Original Authority was dismissed as the Tribunal found the quantification of the duty demand to be appropriate, considering the absence of data from the directed company. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming the Original Authority&#039;s decision in calculating the accurate amount of the duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:04:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1207 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the charge of under valuation but remanded the matter for a denovo quantification of duty based on comparable value of similar products manufactured by others. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the method adopted by the Original Authority was dismissed as the Tribunal found the quantification of the duty demand to be appropriate, considering the absence of data from the directed company. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming the Original Authority&#039;s decision in calculating the accurate amount of the duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>