https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340702 The judgment in the case involving allegations of central excise duty evasion by trading entities dealing with "AVON" branded goods resulted in the setting aside of the order due to legal infirmities, ambiguity in findings, and violations of natural justice principles. The court emphasized the importance of clarity in duty liability determination, fair procedures, and adherence to legal provisions. Some appeals were allowed based on lack of evidence or procedural irregularities, while others were dismissed for non-compliance with excise provisions. The decision underscored the significance of legal clarity and procedural fairness in excise duty cases. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340702 The judgment in the case involving allegations of central excise duty evasion by trading entities dealing with "AVON" branded goods resulted in the setting aside of the order due to legal infirmities, ambiguity in findings, and violations of natural justice principles. The court emphasized the importance of clarity in duty liability determination, fair procedures, and adherence to legal provisions. Some appeals were allowed based on lack of evidence or procedural irregularities, while others were dismissed for non-compliance with excise provisions. The decision underscored the significance of legal clarity and procedural fairness in excise duty cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340702