<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (10) TMI 12 -  GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7215</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee in a case involving interests in trusts, determining that the life interests in the Ahmedabad and Bombay trusts were not annuities and should be included in the net wealth. However, the court held that ornaments and jewellery intended for personal use are exempt under section 5(1)(viii) without the Rs. 25,000 limit. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (10) TMI 12 -  GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7215</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee in a case involving interests in trusts, determining that the life interests in the Ahmedabad and Bombay trusts were not annuities and should be included in the net wealth. However, the court held that ornaments and jewellery intended for personal use are exempt under section 5(1)(viii) without the Rs. 25,000 limit. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>