<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (10) TMI 11 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7212</link>
    <description>Expenditure-tax liability turned on the true character and incidence of the spending. Installation of an air-conditioning plant in a newly built house was treated as expenditure connected with construction or improvement of immovable property and not as a mere household article, so it fell within the exemption under section 5(e). Amounts debited to a Hindu undivided family account for a Kashmir trip and for members&#039; personal expenses were not includible under section 4(i) where they were in substance borne by individual members from separate funds; lawful apportionment of expenditure to reduce tax was not impermissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (10) TMI 11 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7212</link>
      <description>Expenditure-tax liability turned on the true character and incidence of the spending. Installation of an air-conditioning plant in a newly built house was treated as expenditure connected with construction or improvement of immovable property and not as a mere household article, so it fell within the exemption under section 5(e). Amounts debited to a Hindu undivided family account for a Kashmir trip and for members&#039; personal expenses were not includible under section 4(i) where they were in substance borne by individual members from separate funds; lawful apportionment of expenditure to reduce tax was not impermissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>