<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 743 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191209</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the directions issued by the CIT(A) were not binding on the Assessing Officer (AO), allowing the AO to proceed independently with assessment proceedings. The petitioner was granted the option to approach the Tribunal for any further grievances from the CIT(A)&#039;s order, with the Tribunal considering any delay in filing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:26:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 743 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191209</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the directions issued by the CIT(A) were not binding on the Assessing Officer (AO), allowing the AO to proceed independently with assessment proceedings. The petitioner was granted the option to approach the Tribunal for any further grievances from the CIT(A)&#039;s order, with the Tribunal considering any delay in filing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>