https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191207 Detention was upheld against a challenge based on alleged nondisclosure, because the communicated incident itself was treated as sufficient to support the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. The reference to the detenu as a notorious anti-social element and to similar thefts was held to be only an elaboration of the same disclosed incident, not an uncommunicated ground. Since the incident of theft of copper traction wire and disruption of railway services was viewed as grave and indicative of organised and repeated conduct, there was no breach of Article 22(5) or Section 8 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, and the detention order remained valid. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:59:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191207 Detention was upheld against a challenge based on alleged nondisclosure, because the communicated incident itself was treated as sufficient to support the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. The reference to the detenu as a notorious anti-social element and to similar thefts was held to be only an elaboration of the same disclosed incident, not an uncommunicated ground. Since the incident of theft of copper traction wire and disruption of railway services was viewed as grave and indicative of organised and repeated conduct, there was no breach of Article 22(5) or Section 8 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, and the detention order remained valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191207