https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191206 A preventive detention order was held sustainable where the detaining authority had already considered the bail order, and the later application for relaxation of bail conditions and the relaxation order were not material documents whose non-placement or non-supply vitiated detention. A solitary incident of concealed gold smuggling, involving false identity and carriage for monetary consideration, was treated as sufficient to support a reasonable osis of future prejudicial conduct. Alleged delay in service of the detention order and in consideration of the representation was rejected because the time taken was explained and not shown to be inordinate. The rejection communication was also upheld, as it had been read over and explained to the detenu in a language known to him. en-us Fri, 21 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:54:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191206 A preventive detention order was held sustainable where the detaining authority had already considered the bail order, and the later application for relaxation of bail conditions and the relaxation order were not material documents whose non-placement or non-supply vitiated detention. A solitary incident of concealed gold smuggling, involving false identity and carriage for monetary consideration, was treated as sufficient to support a reasonable osis of future prejudicial conduct. Alleged delay in service of the detention order and in consideration of the representation was rejected because the time taken was explained and not shown to be inordinate. The rejection communication was also upheld, as it had been read over and explained to the detenu in a language known to him. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 21 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191206