https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191201 A room fell within the definition of "premises" under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 because the statutory phrase "let or intended to be let separately" qualified a part of a building, and the Act covered buildings becoming vacant after commencement. Requisition for housing a homeless person was a public purpose, and premises vacated on eviction could be requisitioned even if the landlord had sought possession for personal occupation or had not given vacancy intimation. The allotment to the evicted occupant did not by itself establish mala fides. The requisition and allotment were therefore valid, and the appeal failed. en-us Mon, 25 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:57:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191201 A room fell within the definition of "premises" under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 because the statutory phrase "let or intended to be let separately" qualified a part of a building, and the Act covered buildings becoming vacant after commencement. Requisition for housing a homeless person was a public purpose, and premises vacated on eviction could be requisitioned even if the landlord had sought possession for personal occupation or had not given vacancy intimation. The allotment to the evicted occupant did not by itself establish mala fides. The requisition and allotment were therefore valid, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Oct 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191201