https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191199 Where an amending rent-control statute expressly abates pending proceedings based on the withdrawn exemption, a suit for ejectment instituted on that footing terminates in law from the operative date even if the plaint did not expressly recite the clause. The Court held that once statutory abatement took effect, there was no subsisting suit capable of amendment, so the plaint could not later be altered to add legal representatives or pursue a fresh cause of action arising thereafter. The decree founded on such post-abatement amendment and addition of parties was therefore unsustainable. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:55:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191199 Where an amending rent-control statute expressly abates pending proceedings based on the withdrawn exemption, a suit for ejectment instituted on that footing terminates in law from the operative date even if the plaint did not expressly recite the clause. The Court held that once statutory abatement took effect, there was no subsisting suit capable of amendment, so the plaint could not later be altered to add legal representatives or pursue a fresh cause of action arising thereafter. The decree founded on such post-abatement amendment and addition of parties was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191199