<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (7) TMI 47 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7207</link>
    <description>Remuneration paid to a managing partner for actual supervision of agricultural operations was treated as deductible expenditure under section 5(e) of the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955. The court applied the principle that an allowance is permissible where the payment is made under a genuine and bona fide arrangement, is not excessive, and is laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the land. Because the services were actually rendered and the firm would otherwise have had to engage another person on salary, the payment was held to satisfy the statutory test and was allowable as agricultural income-tax expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (7) TMI 47 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7207</link>
      <description>Remuneration paid to a managing partner for actual supervision of agricultural operations was treated as deductible expenditure under section 5(e) of the Madras Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955. The court applied the principle that an allowance is permissible where the payment is made under a genuine and bona fide arrangement, is not excessive, and is laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the land. Because the services were actually rendered and the firm would otherwise have had to engage another person on salary, the payment was held to satisfy the statutory test and was allowable as agricultural income-tax expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>