<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1162 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340659</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing regulations apply to transactions characterised as international transactions; allocation of advertising and marketing promotion (AMP) expenses depends on existence of binding arrangements or concurrent actions by associated enterprises, and absent proof of such obligations the AMP expenditure was not an international transaction and the addition was deleted. Transactional net margin method deemed the most appropriate method subject to confirmation. A selected industry comparable was upheld as acceptable on facts; idle capacity differences require adjustment and matter remitted to AO for quantification. No adjustment for customs duty was warranted on the facts; business promotion expenses disallowed for lack of vouchers and the addition confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1162 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340659</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing regulations apply to transactions characterised as international transactions; allocation of advertising and marketing promotion (AMP) expenses depends on existence of binding arrangements or concurrent actions by associated enterprises, and absent proof of such obligations the AMP expenditure was not an international transaction and the addition was deleted. Transactional net margin method deemed the most appropriate method subject to confirmation. A selected industry comparable was upheld as acceptable on facts; idle capacity differences require adjustment and matter remitted to AO for quantification. No adjustment for customs duty was warranted on the facts; business promotion expenses disallowed for lack of vouchers and the addition confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>