<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1149 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demands and penalties related to allegations of clandestine removal of goods and denial of cenvat credit. Emphasizing the need for concrete evidence to support allegations, the judgment highlighted the importance of rectifying procedural lapses to ensure credit availability. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding lack of independent investigation and unjust denial of credit were upheld, leading to the Tribunal dismissing the Revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:09:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1149 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demands and penalties related to allegations of clandestine removal of goods and denial of cenvat credit. Emphasizing the need for concrete evidence to support allegations, the judgment highlighted the importance of rectifying procedural lapses to ensure credit availability. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding lack of independent investigation and unjust denial of credit were upheld, leading to the Tribunal dismissing the Revenue&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>