<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1146 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340643</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the appellant is not required to reverse/pay Cenvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of final products that became exempted or on inputs used in export goods. The tribunal cited legal precedents supporting this decision and allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a refund of the reversed/paid amount. The impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1146 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340643</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the appellant is not required to reverse/pay Cenvat credit on inputs used in the manufacture of final products that became exempted or on inputs used in export goods. The tribunal cited legal precedents supporting this decision and allowed the appeal, granting the appellant a refund of the reversed/paid amount. The impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>