<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1123 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that Rule 11(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, mandates the reversal of only unutilized credit upon opting for the SSI Exemption Scheme. As the appellant had a nil balance in their Cenvat credit account, no amount needed to be reversed. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand for reversal, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1123 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that Rule 11(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, mandates the reversal of only unutilized credit upon opting for the SSI Exemption Scheme. As the appellant had a nil balance in their Cenvat credit account, no amount needed to be reversed. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand for reversal, and the appellant was granted consequential benefits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>