<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1111 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340608</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders for the years 2007-08 to 2013-14 due to a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not provided with a proper opportunity for a personal hearing with a specified date. The matter was remitted back to the respondent for fresh assessment orders within eight weeks. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1111 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340608</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders for the years 2007-08 to 2013-14 due to a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not provided with a proper opportunity for a personal hearing with a specified date. The matter was remitted back to the respondent for fresh assessment orders within eight weeks. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>