<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 8 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7177</link>
    <description>Long-standing treatment and user of property as endowed property can support a legal inference of dedication even without a formal deed, because no writing is necessary to create an endowment. On the facts, the surrounding circumstances-account treatment, dealings with tenants and leases in the trust&#039;s name, and later registration in the temple manager&#039;s and trust&#039;s name-supported endowment status, while the revenue&#039;s reliance on omission from an earlier deed and prior revenue entries did not establish private ownership. The reference was treated as raising a mixed question of law and fact and was held competent. The inclusion of the deceased&#039;s one-fifth share value in the estate was therefore not justified, and the estate duty assessment failed to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 8 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7177</link>
      <description>Long-standing treatment and user of property as endowed property can support a legal inference of dedication even without a formal deed, because no writing is necessary to create an endowment. On the facts, the surrounding circumstances-account treatment, dealings with tenants and leases in the trust&#039;s name, and later registration in the temple manager&#039;s and trust&#039;s name-supported endowment status, while the revenue&#039;s reliance on omission from an earlier deed and prior revenue entries did not establish private ownership. The reference was treated as raising a mixed question of law and fact and was held competent. The inclusion of the deceased&#039;s one-fifth share value in the estate was therefore not justified, and the estate duty assessment failed to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>