<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1098 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340595</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the final duty assessment should consider the total duty paid for the entire financial year, not on a monthly or consignment basis. It held that provisional assessment under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules mandates a consolidated assessment for the entire year. The tribunal allowed adjustments of excess duty paid against short payments during the final assessment, citing relevant judgments. The Assistant Commissioner&#039;s monthly assessment approach was deemed incorrect, and the tribunal directed a reassessment in line with these principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:13:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1098 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340595</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that the final duty assessment should consider the total duty paid for the entire financial year, not on a monthly or consignment basis. It held that provisional assessment under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules mandates a consolidated assessment for the entire year. The tribunal allowed adjustments of excess duty paid against short payments during the final assessment, citing relevant judgments. The Assistant Commissioner&#039;s monthly assessment approach was deemed incorrect, and the tribunal directed a reassessment in line with these principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>