<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1090 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340587</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case involving allegations of clandestine manufacturing and removal of gutka by M/s. Tarachand Nareshchand. The tribunal found the department&#039;s case lacking in corroborative evidence and unsustainable assumptions regarding production speed. Penalties imposed were deemed unjustified due to the lack of credible evidence. Consequently, the appeals by the appellants were allowed, and they were granted consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1090 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340587</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case involving allegations of clandestine manufacturing and removal of gutka by M/s. Tarachand Nareshchand. The tribunal found the department&#039;s case lacking in corroborative evidence and unsustainable assumptions regarding production speed. Penalties imposed were deemed unjustified due to the lack of credible evidence. Consequently, the appeals by the appellants were allowed, and they were granted consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>