https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340573 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that prior to the 2007 amendment, no duty was payable on the removal of used capital goods, in line with various High Court judgments. The appellant's argument against the necessity to reverse credit on used capital goods was supported by legal precedents, leading to the unsustainability of the impugned order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of statutory provisions and legal precedents in determining the liability to reverse CENVAT credit on capital goods removed after use. en-us Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:12:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340573 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that prior to the 2007 amendment, no duty was payable on the removal of used capital goods, in line with various High Court judgments. The appellant's argument against the necessity to reverse credit on used capital goods was supported by legal precedents, leading to the unsustainability of the impugned order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of statutory provisions and legal precedents in determining the liability to reverse CENVAT credit on capital goods removed after use. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340573