<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1070 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340567</link>
    <description>A single incident may sustain preventive detention where the surrounding facts show organised conduct, advance planning, coordination and future potentiality to repeat prejudicial acts, and the order was upheld on that basis. The detenue&#039;s surrender of passport and the alleged non-placement of the cancellation-of-bail application did not vitiate subjective satisfaction, and preventive detention was held permissible even though ordinary criminal law was available, given the organised smuggling activity. However, unexplained delay in executing the detention order, despite known address details, was found to have snapped the live link between the grounds and detention, rendering the order unsustainable and the writ petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1070 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340567</link>
      <description>A single incident may sustain preventive detention where the surrounding facts show organised conduct, advance planning, coordination and future potentiality to repeat prejudicial acts, and the order was upheld on that basis. The detenue&#039;s surrender of passport and the alleged non-placement of the cancellation-of-bail application did not vitiate subjective satisfaction, and preventive detention was held permissible even though ordinary criminal law was available, given the organised smuggling activity. However, unexplained delay in executing the detention order, despite known address details, was found to have snapped the live link between the grounds and detention, rendering the order unsustainable and the writ petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>