https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340562 The Tribunal overturned the confiscation order of imported goods suspected of misdeclaration for human consumption under Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's evidence proved the goods were correctly declared for animal feed, supported by analytical reports. The Tribunal emphasized no prohibition on importing goods as animal feed and found no violation of import laws, setting aside the confiscation and ruling in favor of the appellant. The judgment stressed adherence to import regulations and the significance of evidence in determining misdeclaration, ultimately upholding the appellant's position. en-us Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340562 The Tribunal overturned the confiscation order of imported goods suspected of misdeclaration for human consumption under Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's evidence proved the goods were correctly declared for animal feed, supported by analytical reports. The Tribunal emphasized no prohibition on importing goods as animal feed and found no violation of import laws, setting aside the confiscation and ruling in favor of the appellant. The judgment stressed adherence to import regulations and the significance of evidence in determining misdeclaration, ultimately upholding the appellant's position. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340562