https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340559 Section 47 CPC is confined to questions of execution, discharge or satisfaction, so an executing court cannot reopen the decree or conduct a fresh merits inquiry on alleged wrong description of a firm, non-impleadment of a purported proprietor, or unsubstantiated allegations of fraud and collusion. A decree may be resisted in execution only if it is a nullity, suffers from an inherent jurisdictional defect, or is otherwise rendered inexecutable by law; an erroneous decree is not void. The decree remained executable, and the execution objections were not maintainable beyond the narrow limits of Section 47. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:11:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340559 Section 47 CPC is confined to questions of execution, discharge or satisfaction, so an executing court cannot reopen the decree or conduct a fresh merits inquiry on alleged wrong description of a firm, non-impleadment of a purported proprietor, or unsubstantiated allegations of fraud and collusion. A decree may be resisted in execution only if it is a nullity, suffers from an inherent jurisdictional defect, or is otherwise rendered inexecutable by law; an erroneous decree is not void. The decree remained executable, and the execution objections were not maintainable beyond the narrow limits of Section 47. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340559