<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1059 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340556</link>
    <description>A statutory appellate remedy does not automatically bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge prima facie alleges violation of natural justice or lack of jurisdiction. The High Court held that the petitioner&#039;s complaint that no opportunity of cross-examination was granted raised a fairness issue in the adjudication process, so the writ petition could not be rejected merely because an alternative appeal existed. The earlier authority relied on was distinguished on facts because no exceptional ground was shown there. The order declining to entertain the writ petition on the sole ground of alternative remedy was set aside and the matter restored for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1059 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340556</link>
      <description>A statutory appellate remedy does not automatically bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge prima facie alleges violation of natural justice or lack of jurisdiction. The High Court held that the petitioner&#039;s complaint that no opportunity of cross-examination was granted raised a fairness issue in the adjudication process, so the writ petition could not be rejected merely because an alternative appeal existed. The earlier authority relied on was distinguished on facts because no exceptional ground was shown there. The order declining to entertain the writ petition on the sole ground of alternative remedy was set aside and the matter restored for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>