<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1043 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340540</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income but directed exclusion of the income already declared while recalculating the penalty, remanding the issue to the Assessing Officer for appropriate computation. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, emphasizing the application of Explanation 5A post-2007 and the necessity for accurate penalty calculation excluding previously declared income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:09:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1043 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340540</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income but directed exclusion of the income already declared while recalculating the penalty, remanding the issue to the Assessing Officer for appropriate computation. The appeal by the Revenue was allowed, emphasizing the application of Explanation 5A post-2007 and the necessity for accurate penalty calculation excluding previously declared income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>