<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1036 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340533</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by estimating the Gross Profit (GP) at 12.5% on alleged bogus purchases, providing partial relief to the assessee. The tribunal upheld the principle that the profit element in such purchases should be added to income, consistent with judicial precedents. The onus was on the assessee to prove the transactions&#039; genuineness, which was not satisfactorily done, leading to profit estimation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:09:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1036 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340533</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal by estimating the Gross Profit (GP) at 12.5% on alleged bogus purchases, providing partial relief to the assessee. The tribunal upheld the principle that the profit element in such purchases should be added to income, consistent with judicial precedents. The onus was on the assessee to prove the transactions&#039; genuineness, which was not satisfactorily done, leading to profit estimation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>