<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1029 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340526</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the rejection of the books of accounts under Section 145(3) and confirmed the addition of Rs. 10 lacs as estimated by the CIT(A). However, the tribunal deleted the adhoc disallowance of 10% of the depreciation on vehicles, agreeing with the assessee&#039;s argument that depreciation is a statutory allowance and should not be restricted based on personal use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1029 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340526</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the rejection of the books of accounts under Section 145(3) and confirmed the addition of Rs. 10 lacs as estimated by the CIT(A). However, the tribunal deleted the adhoc disallowance of 10% of the depreciation on vehicles, agreeing with the assessee&#039;s argument that depreciation is a statutory allowance and should not be restricted based on personal use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>