<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1028 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340525</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to the Assessing Officer (AO) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-compute the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) by excluding certain comparables. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act before setting off brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:08:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1028 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340525</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions to the Assessing Officer (AO) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-compute the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) by excluding certain comparables. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the deduction under section 10B of the Income Tax Act before setting off brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>