<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1572 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) upholding the AO&#039;s additions, ruling that the additions were without jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act. The Tribunal held that the AO could only make additions based on seized materials for assessments that had attained finality on the date of the search. Consequently, the appeals of the revenue were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:17:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1572 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) upholding the AO&#039;s additions, ruling that the additions were without jurisdiction under Section 153C of the Act. The Tribunal held that the AO could only make additions based on seized materials for assessments that had attained finality on the date of the search. Consequently, the appeals of the revenue were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>