https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191156 A government litigant seeking condonation of a 79-day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act must provide material particulars covering the entire period of delay. General assertions that the matter moved through administrative levels and that sanction took time were held insufficient. The Court required concrete facts showing when the papers moved, when sanction was obtained, and why the appeal could not be filed in time. In the absence of such specifics, sufficient cause was not established and the delay was not condoned. en-us Tue, 10 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:17:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191156 A government litigant seeking condonation of a 79-day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act must provide material particulars covering the entire period of delay. General assertions that the matter moved through administrative levels and that sanction took time were held insufficient. The Court required concrete facts showing when the papers moved, when sanction was obtained, and why the appeal could not be filed in time. In the absence of such specifics, sufficient cause was not established and the delay was not condoned. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191156