https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191155 A decree passed in terms of an arbitral award is not amenable to an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, because such decrees are governed by the special scheme of the Arbitration Act, 1940; any interference depends on the statutory framework, not the procedure for ex parte suit decrees. Delay in moving to set aside the award was also not condoned, as notice had been duly served and no sufficient cause was shown under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Article 119(b). The allegation of arbitral misconduct failed as the arbitrators had only construed the contract on the admitted facts and no misconduct was established. en-us Mon, 24 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:12:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191155 A decree passed in terms of an arbitral award is not amenable to an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, because such decrees are governed by the special scheme of the Arbitration Act, 1940; any interference depends on the statutory framework, not the procedure for ex parte suit decrees. Delay in moving to set aside the award was also not condoned, as notice had been duly served and no sufficient cause was shown under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Article 119(b). The allegation of arbitral misconduct failed as the arbitrators had only construed the contract on the admitted facts and no misconduct was established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191155