https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191149 The High Court upheld the decision that the properties acquired in the names of Ramakrishna's wife, son, and grandson were not joint family properties. It was found that these acquisitions were made from Ramakrishna's personal earnings. The Court ruled that the Karta, Ramakrishna, was not liable to account for the management of the family properties before the partition notice. The plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:15:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191149 The High Court upheld the decision that the properties acquired in the names of Ramakrishna's wife, son, and grandson were not joint family properties. It was found that these acquisitions were made from Ramakrishna's personal earnings. The Court ruled that the Karta, Ramakrishna, was not liable to account for the management of the family properties before the partition notice. The plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191149