<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1027 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340524</link>
    <description>Courses in aviation, hospitality and travel management qualified as vocational training because they imparted skills enabling employment or self-employment on completion, so exemption under Notification No. 24/2004-ST applied and the commercial training demand failed. The arrangement with Edexcel, U.K. was one of accreditation and certification, not a grant of representational rights; accordingly, the payment was not taxable as franchise service. Reimbursable expenses recovered from franchisees on actual basis, without markup and as contractually contemplated outgoings, were not includible in taxable value, since the valuation rule could not override the charging provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1027 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340524</link>
      <description>Courses in aviation, hospitality and travel management qualified as vocational training because they imparted skills enabling employment or self-employment on completion, so exemption under Notification No. 24/2004-ST applied and the commercial training demand failed. The arrangement with Edexcel, U.K. was one of accreditation and certification, not a grant of representational rights; accordingly, the payment was not taxable as franchise service. Reimbursable expenses recovered from franchisees on actual basis, without markup and as contractually contemplated outgoings, were not includible in taxable value, since the valuation rule could not override the charging provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>