<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1023 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand due to the delay in filing caused by the non-receipt of the original order served by speed post instead of registered post with acknowledgment due. The lack of evidence of service and the Revenue&#039;s failure to submit an affidavit regarding compliance with statutory provisions led to an adverse inference against the Revenue. The decision emphasized the importance of complying with procedural requirements for serving orders and the necessity of providing evidence of delivery, ultimately remanding the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1023 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand due to the delay in filing caused by the non-receipt of the original order served by speed post instead of registered post with acknowledgment due. The lack of evidence of service and the Revenue&#039;s failure to submit an affidavit regarding compliance with statutory provisions led to an adverse inference against the Revenue. The decision emphasized the importance of complying with procedural requirements for serving orders and the necessity of providing evidence of delivery, ultimately remanding the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>