https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340510 Misdeclaration of imported goods was established through laboratory reports and corroborative circumstantial evidence, including the nature of the goods, supplier communication, and the appellants' control over the consignments. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the declaration of starch as false and found intent to evade customs duty. Confiscation, duty demand, interest, redemption fine, and penalties were therefore sustained as legally maintainable against the appellants. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:17:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340510 Misdeclaration of imported goods was established through laboratory reports and corroborative circumstantial evidence, including the nature of the goods, supplier communication, and the appellants' control over the consignments. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the declaration of starch as false and found intent to evade customs duty. Confiscation, duty demand, interest, redemption fine, and penalties were therefore sustained as legally maintainable against the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340510