<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1005 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340502</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals due to a delay of 283 days in filing them, the discretionary remand by the Tribunal, and the absence of a substantial question of law for consideration at that stage. The Court highlighted the significance of not leniently viewing delays and stressed the necessity of thoroughly assessing all legal aspects before accepting appeals based on their merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:15:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1005 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340502</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals due to a delay of 283 days in filing them, the discretionary remand by the Tribunal, and the absence of a substantial question of law for consideration at that stage. The Court highlighted the significance of not leniently viewing delays and stressed the necessity of thoroughly assessing all legal aspects before accepting appeals based on their merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>