<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 991 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning decisions confirming demands on redetermined goods value and denying CENVAT Credit on capital goods. The judgments were pronounced on 28.02.2017, highlighting the thorough legal reasoning behind the decisions. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding duty payment, credit legitimacy, and past precedents were considered valid, leading to a favorable outcome in both disputed issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:14:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 991 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning decisions confirming demands on redetermined goods value and denying CENVAT Credit on capital goods. The judgments were pronounced on 28.02.2017, highlighting the thorough legal reasoning behind the decisions. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding duty payment, credit legitimacy, and past precedents were considered valid, leading to a favorable outcome in both disputed issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>