https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340486 The adjudicating authority dropped the duty demand on C-4 raffinate by following the Tribunal's earlier classification of the same goods after remand. The Revenue's challenge was directed mainly at the prior Tribunal ruling rather than any legal defect in the impugned order, and no specific error in the adjudication order was shown. An appeal against the present order was therefore not the proper route to reopen a different decision already relied on by the authority below, and the order was upheld in favour of the assessee. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:14:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340486 The adjudicating authority dropped the duty demand on C-4 raffinate by following the Tribunal's earlier classification of the same goods after remand. The Revenue's challenge was directed mainly at the prior Tribunal ruling rather than any legal defect in the impugned order, and no specific error in the adjudication order was shown. An appeal against the present order was therefore not the proper route to reopen a different decision already relied on by the authority below, and the order was upheld in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340486