<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 988 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s T K Warana Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd regarding the classification of &#039;sugar&#039; under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute centered on duty, interest, and penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1994 for the period from 1st October 2001 to 31st December 2002. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate classification of sugar to determine duty liabilities, highlighting compliance with regulatory requirements under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to statutory provisions for proper classification to avoid disputes and ensure compliance with excise laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 988 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s T K Warana Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd regarding the classification of &#039;sugar&#039; under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute centered on duty, interest, and penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1994 for the period from 1st October 2001 to 31st December 2002. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate classification of sugar to determine duty liabilities, highlighting compliance with regulatory requirements under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to statutory provisions for proper classification to avoid disputes and ensure compliance with excise laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>