https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340473 Concurrent findings that cash deposits, alleged advances against sale agreements, and undisclosed interest were not satisfactorily explained were based on appreciation of evidence at all three stages. The High Court held that the authorities had taken a probable view on the facts, with no perversity or arguable legal issue shown. As the challenge did not raise any substantial question of law, the additions were not interfered with and the appeal failed at the threshold. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340473 Concurrent findings that cash deposits, alleged advances against sale agreements, and undisclosed interest were not satisfactorily explained were based on appreciation of evidence at all three stages. The High Court held that the authorities had taken a probable view on the facts, with no perversity or arguable legal issue shown. As the challenge did not raise any substantial question of law, the additions were not interfered with and the appeal failed at the threshold. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340473