<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 959 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340456</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The issue of the Rs. 2,28,424 discrepancy in labour charges was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh determination, providing the assessee with another chance to reconcile the differences. The disallowance of Rs. 22,687 in interest expenditure under Section 14A was overturned as the Tribunal found that the investments were made from the assessee&#039;s interest-free funds, following the presumption established in relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:11:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 959 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340456</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The issue of the Rs. 2,28,424 discrepancy in labour charges was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh determination, providing the assessee with another chance to reconcile the differences. The disallowance of Rs. 22,687 in interest expenditure under Section 14A was overturned as the Tribunal found that the investments were made from the assessee&#039;s interest-free funds, following the presumption established in relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>