<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 955 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340452</link>
    <description>The court remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for further verification regarding the disallowance of payment made under sections 194C and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The court allowed the appeal by the revenue and the cross-objections by the assessee for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of thorough examination and verification of the legal issues and payments made by the joint venture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:11:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 955 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340452</link>
      <description>The court remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer for further verification regarding the disallowance of payment made under sections 194C and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The court allowed the appeal by the revenue and the cross-objections by the assessee for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of thorough examination and verification of the legal issues and payments made by the joint venture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>