<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 952 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340449</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, sustaining the addition of Rs. 3,68,605/- (comprising Rs. 1,68,605/- as GP and Rs. 2,00,000/- as seed capital) and directed the AO to recompute the penalty accordingly. The Tribunal&#039;s decision reflects a balanced approach, considering both the assessee&#039;s inability to substantiate claims and the need for a reasonable estimation of unaccounted income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 952 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340449</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, sustaining the addition of Rs. 3,68,605/- (comprising Rs. 1,68,605/- as GP and Rs. 2,00,000/- as seed capital) and directed the AO to recompute the penalty accordingly. The Tribunal&#039;s decision reflects a balanced approach, considering both the assessee&#039;s inability to substantiate claims and the need for a reasonable estimation of unaccounted income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>