<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 947 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340444</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision to dismiss the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s failure to provide sufficient evidence and details to substantiate the claim for depreciation on fixed assets. The judgment highlighted the importance of concrete proof of asset acquisition and ownership to support depreciation claims under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 947 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340444</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision to dismiss the appeal, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s failure to provide sufficient evidence and details to substantiate the claim for depreciation on fixed assets. The judgment highlighted the importance of concrete proof of asset acquisition and ownership to support depreciation claims under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>