<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1170 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, assessment discrepancies, non-compliance with assessment directions, and verification of submitted details. The judgment emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s duty to verify the assessee&#039;s information and provided relief due to the officer&#039;s failure to do so.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=461980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1170 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning additions under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, assessment discrepancies, non-compliance with assessment directions, and verification of submitted details. The judgment emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s duty to verify the assessee&#039;s information and provided relief due to the officer&#039;s failure to do so.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>